Planning & Design | Blog Post
2017
Evaluator, Researcher, Both?
Having served as a project evaluator and as a project researcher, it is apparent to me how critical it is to have...
Showing 131 Results
Management, Planning & Design | Blog Post
2017
Evaluating New Technology
As a STEM practitioner and evaluator, I have had many opportunities to assess new and existing courses, workshops, and programs. But there...
Data Collection and Analysis, Planning & Design | Blog Post
2017
Evaluating Network Growth through Social Network Analysis
One of the most impactful learning experiences from the ATE Principal Investigators Conference I attended in October 2016 was the growing use...
Management, Planning & Design | Blog Post
2017
Gauging Workplace Readiness Among Cyberforensics Program Graduates
In this blog, I share my experience leading a multi-year external evaluation that provided useful insights about how to best strengthen the...
Planning & Design | Blog Post
2017
Evolution of Evaluation as ATE Grows Up
I attended a packed workshop by EvaluATE called “A Practical Approach to Outcome Evaluation” at the 2016 NSF ATE Principal Investigators Conference....
Planning & Design | Blog Post
2017
Designing a Purposeful Mixed Methods Evaluation
A mixed methods evaluation involves collecting, analyzing, and integrating data from both quantitative and qualitative sources. Sometimes, I find that while I...
Management, Planning & Design | Blog Post
2017
Declutter Your Reports: The Checklist for Straightforward Evaluation Reports
Evaluation reports have a reputation for being long, overly complicated, and impractical. The recent buzz about fresh starts and tidying up for...
Management, Planning & Design | Checklist
2016
Program Evaluation Report Content
This checklist identifies and describes the elements of an evaluation report. It is intended to serve as a flexible guide for determining an evaluation report’s content.
Planning & Design | Webinar
2016
Outcome Evaluation: Step-by-Step
Learn how to identify appropriate outcomes to assess in an evaluation and how to use those intended outcomes as a foundation for planning or enhancing data collection, analysis, and interpretation.
EvaluATE is supported by the National Science Foundation under grant numbers 0802245, 1204683, 1600992, and 1841783. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed on this site are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.