Filter By
Sort By
Reset Filters
Showing 131 Results
Showing 131 Results
Management, Planning & Design | Guide
2018

Evaluation Process

Highlights the four main steps of an ATE Evaluation, and provides detailed activities for each step.

Planning & Design | Guide
2018

ATE Program Overview

An overview of the NSF Advanced Technological Education program, broken out into funding levels.

Management, Planning & Design | Guide
2018

Getting Started with Your Evaluation

Getting Started With Your ATE Evaluation, a basic guide on the basics of starting your evaluation.

Planning & Design | Webinar
2018

Evaluation Basics for Non-evaluators

In this webinar, we’ll answer these and other common questions about program evaluation.

Data Collection and Analysis, Management, Planning & Design | Blog Post
2018

Part 2: Using Embedded Assessment to Understand Science Skills

In our last EvaluATE blog, we defined embedded assessments (EAs) and described the benefits and challenges of using EAs to measure and...

Planning & Design | Webinar
2017

Evaluation: All the Funded ATE Proposals Are Doing It

This webinar will review the key elements of a winning evaluation plan and strategies for demonstrating to reviewers that evaluation is an integral part of your project, not an afterthought.

Interpretation, Management, Planning & Design | Blog Post
2017

Integrating Perspectives for a Quality Evaluation Design

Designing a rigorous and informative evaluation depends on communication with program staff to understand planned activities and how those activities relate to...

Engagement, Management, Planning & Design | Template
2017

ATE Proposal Evaluation Plan

This template is for use in preparing the evaluation plan sections for proposals to the National Science Foundation’s Advanced Technological Education (ATE) program. It is based on the ATE Evaluation Planning Checklist, also developed by EvaluATE.

Nation Science Foundation Logo EvaluATE is supported by the National Science Foundation under grant numbers 0802245, 1204683, 1600992, and 1841783. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed on this site are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.