Filter By
Sort By
Reset Filters
Showing 24 Results
Showing 24 Results
Data Collection and Analysis | Guide
2017

How to create a retrospective pre-post survey in Google Forms

We had a great question come in through Twitter- “Q: Any clue how to structure items for retrospective pre-post surveys in #GoogleForms?”...

None | Guide
2015

Doc: HI-TEC 2016- LOGIC MODELS: THE SWISS ARMY KNIFE OF PROJECT PLANNING and EVALUATION

A strong evaluation plan that is well integrated into your grant proposal will strengthen your submission and maybe even give you a competitive edge. In this session we’ll provide insights on ways to enhance your proposal and avoid common pitfalls with regard to evaluation. We’ll walk through EvaluATE’s Evaluation Planning Checklist for ATE Proposals, which provides detailed guidance on how to address evaluation throughout a proposal—from the project summary to the budget justification.

Communication, Dissemination, & Use of Results, Engagement, Interpretation | Guide
2015

Evaluation Recommendations

This is a one page list of helpful tips to use when writing evaluation recommendations.

Management | Guide
2014

National Science Foundation Annual Report Requirements

This document is a compilation of the Research.gov annual reports system components. This document was prepared by EvaluATE (NSF #1204683) to assist Advanced Technological Education (ATE) program grantees in preparing their annual reports. No modifications or additions have been made to the original text from Research.gov. This document identifies each component of the annual report and provides NSF’s descriptions of what should be addressed in each section.

Data Collection and Analysis | Guide
2011

ATE Google Analytics for Evaluation: Handbook & Benchmarks

Guide for using google analytics for evaluation

Nation Science Foundation Logo EvaluATE is supported by the National Science Foundation under grant numbers 0802245, 1204683, 1600992, and 1841783. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed on this site are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.