Filter By
Sort By
Reset Filters
Showing 611 Results
Showing 611 Results
Data Collection and Analysis, Planning & Design | Blog Post
2014

Evaluating ATE Efforts Using Peer-Generated Surveys

During the course of evaluating the sustainability of NSF’s Advanced Technological Education program, I introduced a new method for creating evaluation surveys....

Interpretation | Blog Post
2014

Evaluating Impact: How I Moved From Pipeline to Interstate

John Sener of Sener Knowledge LLC, an external evaluator for over a dozen ATE and other NSF grants over the past eight...

None | Checklist
2014

Common Guidelines: Type 1 – Foundational Research

This checklist is a distillation of key points from the Common Guidelines for Education Research and Development regarding Foundational Research. The Guidelines,...

None | Checklist
2014

Common Guidelines: Type 2 – Early Stage or Exploratory Research

This checklist is a distillation of key points from the Common Guidelines for Education Research and Development regarding Early-Stage or Exploratory Research....

None | Checklist
2014

Common Guidelines: Type 3 – Design and Development Research

This checklist is a distillation of key points from the Common Guidelines for Education Research and Development regarding Design and Development Research....

None | Checklist
2014

Common Guidelines: Type 4 – Efficacy Research

This checklist is a distillation of key points from the Common Guidelines for Education Research and Development regarding Efficacy Research. The Guidelines,...

None | Checklist
2014

Common Guidelines: Type 5 – Effectiveness Research

This checklist is a distillation of key points from the Common Guidelines for Education Research and Development regarding <strong>Effectiveness Research</strong>. The Guidelines,...

None | Checklist
2014

Common Guidelines Type 6 – Scale-Up Research

This checklist is a distillation of key points from the Common Guidelines for Education Research and Development regarding Scale-Up Research. The Guidelines,...

Nation Science Foundation Logo EvaluATE is supported by the National Science Foundation under grant numbers 0802245, 1204683, 1600992, and 1841783. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed on this site are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.