Filter By
Sort By
Reset Filters
Showing 611 Results
Showing 611 Results
Communication, Dissemination, & Use of Results, Management, Planning & Design | Blog Post
2016

Strategic Knowledge Mapping: A New Tool for Visualizing and Using Evaluation Findings in STEM

A challenge to designing effective STEM programs is that they address very large, complex goals, such as increasing the numbers of underrepresented...

None | Newsletter
2016

Revisiting Intellectual Merit and Broader Impact

If you have ever written a proposal to the National Science Foundation (NSF) or participated in a proposal review panel for NSF,...

None | Newsletter
2016

Survey Says Winter 2016

On the 2015 ATE survey, 65 of 230 principal investigators (28%) reported spending some portion of their annual budgets on research. Six...

None | Newsletter
2016

Transformative

NSF identifies five questions that proposal reviewers should consider in relation to the NSF merit criteria of Intellectual Merit and Broader Impacts.1...

None | Newsletter
2016

How can PIs demonstrate that their projects have “advanced knowledge”?

NSF’s Intellectual Merit criterion is about advancing knowledge and understanding within a given field or across fields. Publication in peer-reviewed journals provides...

None | Newsletter
2016

Communicating Results from Prior NSF Support

ATE proposal season is many months away in early October, but if you are submitting for new funding this year, now is...

None | Newsletter
2016

Project Spotlight: PATHTECH Successful Academic & Employment Pathways in Advanced Technologies

Will Tyson is PI for Path Tech, an ATE targeted research project. He is an associate professor of sociology at the University...

None | Newsletter
2016

2016 Winter

This is the pdf version of our Winter 2016 Newsletter. This issue is focused on proposal development. File: Click Here Type: Newsletter...

Nation Science Foundation Logo EvaluATE is supported by the National Science Foundation under grant numbers 0802245, 1204683, 1600992, and 1841783. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed on this site are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.