Filter By
Sort By
Reset Filters
Showing 24 Results
Showing 24 Results
Interpretation, Management, Planning & Design | Blog Post
2017

Integrating Perspectives for a Quality Evaluation Design

Designing a rigorous and informative evaluation depends on communication with program staff to understand planned activities and how those activities relate to...

Communication, Dissemination, & Use of Results, Interpretation | Blog Post
2017

Evaluation’s Role in Helping Clients Avoid GroupThink

In December of 2016, I presented a poster on a STEM-C education project at the Restore America’s Estuaries National Summit, co-hosted by...

Data Collection and Analysis, Interpretation, Management, Planning & Design | Slides
2016

ATE PI 2016- A Practical Approach to Outcome Evaluation: Step-by-Step

Data Collection and Analysis, Interpretation, Management, Planning & Design | Slides
2016

ATE PI 2016 Workshop- A Practical Approach to Outcome Evaluation: Step-by-Step

Data Collection and Analysis, Interpretation | Blog Post
2016

Possible Selves: A Way to Assess Identity and Career Aspirations

Children are often asked the question “What do you want to be when you grow up?” Many of us evaluate programs where...

Data Collection and Analysis, Interpretation | Blog Post
2016

Six Data Cleaning Checks

Data cleaning is the process of verifying and editing data files to address issues of inconsistency and missing information. Errors in data...

Communication, Dissemination, & Use of Results, Interpretation, Management, Planning & Design | Slides
2015

ATE PI 2015- Workshop: Mid-Life Project Evaluation: Setting the Stage for Continued Funding

Data Collection and Analysis, Interpretation | Blog Post
2015

Tips for Data Preparation

Over the course of analyzing data for a number of projects, I have encountered several situations that can make it hard to...

Communication, Dissemination, & Use of Results, Engagement, Interpretation | Guide
2015

Evaluation Recommendations

This is a one page list of helpful tips to use when writing evaluation recommendations.

Nation Science Foundation Logo EvaluATE is supported by the National Science Foundation under grant numbers 0802245, 1204683, 1600992, and 1841783. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed on this site are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.